Like 盛世?
Join aNobii to see if your friends read it, and discover similar books!
Book Description
這是陳冠中繼他的《香港三部曲》後寫成的中長篇小說。小說題材虛構, 背景是當代大中國, 是未來的2013年的中國。可以說這是一部奇特的寓言小說。評論家李歐梵教授讀後說“小說題材發前人之所未發, 一開篇就精采無比, 欲罷不能, 緊張刺激而又令人心泛寒意, 實在不容錯過”。
陳冠中這部題名為《盛世: 中國2013年》的小說, 寫世界經濟於金融海嘯後, 全球格局進入冰河時期, 中國卻安然避過劫難, 反而開始步入千年一遇的盛世。小說家的意圖是, 中國盛世真的來臨了嗎？會不會所有的一切只是人為製造出來的一種迷幻效應？小說情節奇構, 生鬼荒謬, 有些令人驚嚇有些讓人哭笑不是。
作者簡介
陳冠中，原籍寧波 Continue
3 Reviews
-
Duncan2 said on Jan 10, 2012 | Add your feedback
-
盛世還是獻世
Please check my blog post:
2chanze said on Sep 1, 2011 | Add your feedback
-
Entertaining ..but scary
It is an intertesting read - first I thought it is autobiography, then realised it is not.
The part about how China could emerge a great power is intriguing and very imaginative - an autocratic government can justify anything and deny people's right to know. It made me realise I cannot live in Chin ... (continue)Flowerpond said on Dec 10, 2009 | Add your feedback
Book Details
-
Rating:
(279)
-
5 stars
-
4 stars
-
3 stars
-
2 stars
-
1 star
-
5 stars
- 繁體書
- Paperback 261 Pages
- Edition: 1
- ISBN-10: 0193958465
- ISBN-13: 9780193958463
- Publisher: 牛津大學出版社
- Pub date: Oct 01, 2009
- Also available as: Others
-
In other languages:
-
The Fat Years
(English Books)
... and other languages
-
Prices Change currency & sellers
| ISBN | Edition | List | Sale | Seller |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9780193958463 | Paperback | -- | -- | -- |
| Other editions → | ||||
| + 9 copies tradable: → | ||||
MonMon 
It was a really good book, and very interesting in the early part, and it probably went very well all the way but the ending is a bumper! A very very long speech, and it doesn't look like a story any more. It's more like a conclusion after some serious research, so is that it? China should go this w ... (continue)
It was a really good book, and very interesting in the early part, and it probably went very well all the way but the ending is a bumper! A very very long speech, and it doesn't look like a story any more. It's more like a conclusion after some serious research, so is that it? China should go this way? Do we all agree or convinced?
Is this helpful?