Like Cycles of Time?
Join aNobii to see if your friends read it, and discover similar books!
Book Description
In Cycles of Time, he moves far beyond this to develop a completely new perspective oncosmology, providing a quite unexpected answer to the often-asked ...
2 Reviews
-
Yip Kin said on Sep 13, 2011 | Add your feedback
-




Very interesting, but quite formal, complex and specialized
I loved this book because it explains a new revolutionary theory about how our universe is built. However, I would be lying if I said that I read it all. Actually I had to abandon it after trying to give all my attention to part 1. Part 2 and 3 looked packed with graphics and complicated formulas, a ... (continue)
ariadna73 said on Jun 23, 2011 | Add your feedback
Book Details
-
Rating:




(6)
- English Books
- Others 400 Pages
- ISBN-10: 0224080369
- ISBN-13: 9780224080361
- Publisher: Bodley Head
- Pub date: Oct 26, 2010
- In other languages: other languages
Prices Change currency & sellers
| ISBN | Edition | List | Sale | Seller |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9780224080361 | Others | $40.30 | $29.70 | The Book Depository |
| Other editions → | ||||
*** This comment contains spoilers! ***
Not for the layman
It's like a book for the public but I'm afraid only the experts can fully appreciate and comprehend most of the contents. To me, the biggest appeal of Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (CCC) is that it provides a smooth transition between the previous aeon to the present aeon of our Universe. It's a brave ... (continue)
It's like a book for the public but I'm afraid only the experts can fully appreciate and comprehend most of the contents. To me, the biggest appeal of Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (CCC) is that it provides a smooth transition between the previous aeon to the present aeon of our Universe. It's a brave idea that I've probably never heard of. The CCC mechanism may take away some of the violence of the Big Bang. The author is really conveying his challenging ideas to the experts. It's like a hugely extended paper to promote his ideas of the CCC. The possibility of observing some signatures of the previous aeon is mind-boggling and very appealing. But near the end on p. 205, he suddenly uses as much as a figure (Fig. 3.22) to explain that the radius is a reciprocal measure of curvature, which seems like out of place, because if the readers don't know about this and the readers probably don't know anything before p. 205.
On p. 194 at the last line, "back hole" should be "black hole".
Is this helpful?