Similar books
The Blind Watchmaker | Breaking the Spell | A Devil's Chaplain | Sweet Dreams | The Red Queen |
Book Description
In a book that is both groundbreaking and accessible, Daniel C. Dennett, whom Chet Raymo of The Boston Globe calls "one of the most provocative thinkers on the planet," focuses his unerringly logical mind on the theory of natural selection, showing how Darwin's great idea transforms and illuminates our traditional view of humanity's place in the universe. Dennett vividly describes the theory itself and then extends Darwin's vision with impeccable arguments to their often surprising conclusions, challenging the views of some of the most famous scientists of our day.
Groups with this in collection
Philosophy of Biology & Theoretical Biology (生物哲學&理論生物學) (27) |
- Book Details
- English Books
- Rating:



(7)
4 stars 
3 stars 
2 stars 
1 star 
- Paperback 592 Pages
- Edition: 1st Touchstone Ed
- ISBN-10: 068482471X
- ISBN-13: 9780684824710
- Publisher: Simon & Schuster
- Pub date: Jun 12, 1996
- Dimensions: 23 cm x 16 cm x 3 cm Just how big is that?
- Also available as: Hardcover

FAQ
How does the voting work?
Find a comment helpful / unhelpful? Cast your vote. Only one vote from each person will be counted. Every hour we gather all the votes, add them up, add some magic source, and there we have the new sorting for the comments on the page of this book!I see mistakes in the book information. How can I fix it?
Under "Book details", there is a link labeled "Improve data of this book". You can use that form to send us the correct information.



Natural selection is best conceived of as a "substrate neutral algorithm." Seen in this way, it begins to act as a sort of "universal acid" whose unsettling implications cannot be contained. The book is uneven--the stuff about memes is unconvincing. But it was a worthwhile read for the concepts of s ... Continue
Natural selection is best conceived of as a "substrate neutral algorithm." Seen in this way, it begins to act as a sort of "universal acid" whose unsettling implications cannot be contained. The book is uneven--the stuff about memes is unconvincing. But it was a worthwhile read for the concepts of skyhook and crane alone.