Like ENIGMA OF CAPITAL, THE?
Join aNobii to see if your friends read it, and discover similar books!
2 Reviews
-
mathias said on Feb 5, 2012 | Add your feedback
-




Soft on capitalism critique, hard on the myth of growth
A different, interesting, good perspective on economics.
The first valuable feature of this book is the unusual story it tells: a history of capitalism from a very critical perspective, which is a welcome change from that of most common popular economy books. It depicts capitalism as an engine of ... (continue)
Famiglia Marcellino said on Aug 28, 2011 | Add your feedback
Book Details
-
Rating:




(4)
- English Books
- Others 320 Pages
- ISBN-10: 1846683092
- ISBN-13: 9781846683091
- Publisher: Profile
- Pub date: Jun 01, 2011
Prices Change currency & sellers
| ISBN | Edition | List | Sale | Seller |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9781846683091 | Others | $20.50 | $11.44 | The Book Depository |
| + 1 copy tradable: → | ||||
Again, another nice book by Harvey.
The foundation of the Enigma is in Marx's Capital: there is basically nothing new compared to that. Harvey's book is focused on the crises of capitalism, and tries to explain why they do not simply happen and why crises are a necessity.
This is done in a very cle ... (continue)
Again, another nice book by Harvey.
The foundation of the Enigma is in Marx's Capital: there is basically nothing new compared to that. Harvey's book is focused on the crises of capitalism, and tries to explain why they do not simply happen and why crises are a necessity.
This is done in a very clear way, going through some of the analysis of the Capital, looking at modern history till 2010, revealing how crises of capitalism have succeded, how they have never been solved but merely moved away, elsewhere.
The book is concluded by a couple of chapters on alternatives: how they may happen and who may be the protagonists.
In these times when we are flodded by neoliberal concepts such as austerity and cuts, this book turns out to help looking at them from a different and alternative point of view, which is too seldom considered.
Is this helpful?