Like The Holographic Universe?
Join aNobii to see if your friends read it, and discover similar books!
Book Description
Today nearly everyone is familiar with holograms, three-dimensional images projected into space with the aid of a laser. Now, two of the world's most eminent thinkers -- University of London physicists David Bohm, a former protege of Einstein's and one of the world's most respected quantum physicContinue
Book Details
-
Rating:




(9)
- English Books
- Paperback 338 Pages
- Edition: Reprint
- ISBN-10: 0060922583
- ISBN-13: 9780060922580
- Publisher: Harper Perennial
- Pub date: May 06, 1992
- Dimensions: 1290 mm x 839 mm x 129 mm Just how big is that?
- Also available as: Others
Prices Change currency & sellers
| ISBN | Edition | List | Sale | Seller |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9780060922580 | Paperback | $14.99 | $10.79 | bn.com |
| $14.99 | $8.99 | The Book Depository | ||
| Other editions → | ||||
What is this about?
This is probably the first time I buy a book thinking about a subject and discovering a total different text.
Apparently this book should talk about the theory of holographic universe, explaining what it means for the reality to appear three-dimensional while it really is bi-dimensional. This should ... (continue)
This is probably the first time I buy a book thinking about a subject and discovering a total different text.
Apparently this book should talk about the theory of holographic universe, explaining what it means for the reality to appear three-dimensional while it really is bi-dimensional. This should be about information theory, black hole entropy and so on.
Surprisingly this book is totally different: it just take some holographic principles for granted and start by discussing each and every kind of para-normal, supernatural event or perception.
In the very beginning of the book there is some small scientific diversions, but in the rest of the volume, every non-scientific phenomenon is just assumed as real and explainable by the holographic principle.
In the final parts of the book, it became almost anti-scientific and I can't justify in any possible way the results the book presumes to explain.
Is this helpful?