Similar books
Seen | Unseen | Science and Religion, 1450--1900 | The Science of Describing | Revolutionizing the Sciences | Objectivity |
Book Description
Throughout the history of the Western world, science has possessed an extraordinary amount of authority and prestige. Despite numerous evolutions and revolutions, it maintains its distinction as the knowing endeavor that explains how the natural world works and offers insight into the meaning of the universe.
In The Intelligibility of Nature, Peter Dear considers how science as such has evolved and positioned itself. His intellectual journey begins with a crucial observation: that scientific ambition is, and has been, directed toward two distinct but frequently conflated ends—doing and knowing. The ancient Greeks articulated the difference between craft and understanding, and according to Dear, that separation has survived to shape attitudes toward science ever since.
Teasing out the tension between doing and knowing during key episodes in the history of science—mechanical philosophy and Newtonian gravitation; elective affinities and the chemical revolution; enlightened natural history and taxonomy; evolutionary biology; the dynamical theory of electromagnetism; and quantum theory—Dear reveals how the two principles became formalized into a single enterprise, science, that would be carried out by a new kind of person, the scientist.
Finely nuanced and elegantly conceived, The Intelligibility of Nature will be essential reading for aficionados and historians of science alike.
“Just as the body of knowledge evolves over time, so does the way scientists view the world they are explaining. This interplay between knowledge and mental model is the subject of Peter Dear's book. He shows how mechanistic explanations in physics and chemistry became ever more frequent after the industrial revolution, only to be supplanted by the nihilism of quantum theory in the social turmoil that followed the first world war. It is full of insights into how society, culture and people's perception interweave across biology, chemistry and physics.”—Adrian Barnett, New Scientist
In The Intelligibility of Nature, Peter Dear considers how science as such has evolved and positioned itself. His intellectual journey begins with a crucial observation: that scientific ambition is, and has been, directed toward two distinct but frequently conflated ends—doing and knowing. The ancient Greeks articulated the difference between craft and understanding, and according to Dear, that separation has survived to shape attitudes toward science ever since.
Teasing out the tension between doing and knowing during key episodes in the history of science—mechanical philosophy and Newtonian gravitation; elective affinities and the chemical revolution; enlightened natural history and taxonomy; evolutionary biology; the dynamical theory of electromagnetism; and quantum theory—Dear reveals how the two principles became formalized into a single enterprise, science, that would be carried out by a new kind of person, the scientist.
Finely nuanced and elegantly conceived, The Intelligibility of Nature will be essential reading for aficionados and historians of science alike.
“Just as the body of knowledge evolves over time, so does the way scientists view the world they are explaining. This interplay between knowledge and mental model is the subject of Peter Dear's book. He shows how mechanistic explanations in physics and chemistry became ever more frequent after the industrial revolution, only to be supplanted by the nihilism of quantum theory in the social turmoil that followed the first world war. It is full of insights into how society, culture and people's perception interweave across biology, chemistry and physics.”—Adrian Barnett, New Scientist
- Book Details
- English Books
- Paperback 254 Pages
- Edition: Reprint
- ISBN-10: 0226139492
- ISBN-13: 9780226139494
- Publisher: University Of Chicago Press
- Pub date: Jan 01, 2008
Buying Info Change currency & sellers
|
FAQ
How does the voting work?
Find a comment helpful / unhelpful? Cast your vote. Only one vote from each person will be counted. Every hour we gather all the votes, add them up, add some magic source, and there we have the new sorting for the comments on the page of this book!I see mistakes in the book information. How can I fix it?
Under "Book details", there is a link labeled "Improve data of this book". You can use that form to send us the correct information.

USA

The topic is very interesting: Science is sometimes said to be hitting the truth because it does instrumental work, but other times its instrumentality is explained by the fact that it has hit on the truth. Those who emphasize truth speak of old-school natural philosophy; those who stress intsrument ... Continue
The topic is very interesting: Science is sometimes said to be hitting the truth because it does instrumental work, but other times its instrumentality is explained by the fact that it has hit on the truth. Those who emphasize truth speak of old-school natural philosophy; those who stress intsrumentality talk about techno-science. Unfortunately, Dear's examples of these different understandings of science are all well worn (Newton, Einstein, Maxwell, and other big names). Something fresh, please![return][return]Probably the high point of the book was his discussion of Huygens and the mechanistic notion of intelligibility. I had never thought of this point: Why should two perfectly incompressible objects rebound after collision? What happens when they touch at a single mathematical point? It defies intution, and is arguably unintelligible.