Blog this item

The Interpretation of Murder

By Jed Rubenfeld

(74)

| Paperback | 9780755331420

Like The Interpretation of Murder?
Join aNobii to see if your friends read it, and discover similar books!

Critics

The Interpretation Of Murder

Sigmund Freud visited America only once, and for the rest of his life complained about Americans as ’savages’ and blamed many of his numerous ills on that trip. But the lectures he delivered at the unlikely location of Clark University in Worcester. ... (read full critics)

shotsmag published on Wed, 29 Sep 2010

The Interpretation of Murder By Jed Rubenfeld

A young woman has been murdered in 1909 New York City, and one traumatized girl holds the key to finding the killer in Jed Rubenfeld's highly anticipated literary mystery, The Interpretation of Murder. Freudian analyst Dr. Stratham Younger is called ... (read full critics)

bookpage published on Fri, 17 Sep 2010

See all critics

7 Reviews

1 person find this helpful

Twists & turns, and surprisingly romantic, interesting read with background on Freud & Jung. Interplays of Freud & Jung's relationship with main plot of the story, interesting styles.

Is this helpful?

Andrew Chai said on Nov 18, 2008 | Add your feedback

1 person find this helpful

Occasionally rambling and full of irrelevances, but generally interesting novel. Also occasionally stretched reality too too far.

Is this helpful?

Canda said on Dec 5, 2007 about the Hardcover edition | Add your feedback

As a thriller, the book is passable. The plot is quick enough, the characters intriguing enough, the twists and turns surprising enough.
But as a detective novel, it is laughable. A good detective novel should make you want to solve the mystery along with the protagonist, and should also leave yo ... (continue)

As a thriller, the book is passable. The plot is quick enough, the characters intriguing enough, the twists and turns surprising enough.
But as a detective novel, it is laughable. A good detective novel should make you want to solve the mystery along with the protagonist, and should also leave you ahh-ing and wow-ing when the "master detective" explains his brilliant deductions at the end. But no, this book has the opposite effect on me. The more it is explained at the end, the more incredulity I feel - I was like, "What the heck?!" I guess the author needs to hone his skills in concluding a detective story.
But I will still give it four stars, simply because of the exceptionally well-written introduction, which I quote here:
"Unhappy men are all alike. Some wound they suffered long ago, some wish denied, some blow to pride, some kindling spark of love put out by scorn - or worse, indifference - cleaves to them, or they to it, and so they live each day within a shroud of yesterdays. The happy man does not look back. He doesn't look ahead. He lives in the present."
"But there's the rub. The present can never deliver one thing: meaning. The ways of happiness and meaning are not the same. To find happiness, a man need only live in the moment; he need only live for the moment. But if he wants meaning - the meaning of his dreams, his secrets, his life - a man must reinhabit his past, however dark, and live for the future, however uncertain. Thus nature dangles happiness and meaning before us all, insisting only that we choose between them."
If only the above introduction were more relevant to the story...

Is this helpful?

Holmes said on Feb 5, 2012 about the Mass Market Paperback edition | Add your feedback

I was interested enough to read it to the end But I didn't find the writing inspired. I would not seek out another book by the same author.
There were interesting ideas about life, at the end. Discussion of whether we can be authentic or are always players. Also a few ideas challenging Freud's idea ... (continue)

I was interested enough to read it to the end But I didn't find the writing inspired. I would not seek out another book by the same author.
There were interesting ideas about life, at the end. Discussion of whether we can be authentic or are always players. Also a few ideas challenging Freud's ideas about oedipal complex.

Is this helpful?

Annajross said on May 20, 2010 | Add your feedback

Set during Freud's visit to New York around the turn of the last century this novel works reasonably well,but the writing is at times very clumsy and uninvolving.Every now and then the narrative stops and the author presents us with a great slab of description of a building or a large chunk of local ... (continue)

Set during Freud's visit to New York around the turn of the last century this novel works reasonably well,but the writing is at times very clumsy and uninvolving.Every now and then the narrative stops and the author presents us with a great slab of description of a building or a large chunk of local history.That apart,it's a reasonable plot, although not one that will tax your intelligence too much,and the characters are fairly well drawn without ever being compelling.

Is this helpful?

Lunarossa said on Jul 20, 2009 | Add your feedback

This novel - with a far-fetched plot - is based to a large extent on the visit that Sigmund Freud made to New York in 1909. It starts off well and has the makings of a good detective story, but the psychoanalyses introduced into the plot tends to make it evolve into the realm of fantasy. I feel the ... (continue)

This novel - with a far-fetched plot - is based to a large extent on the visit that Sigmund Freud made to New York in 1909. It starts off well and has the makings of a good detective story, but the psychoanalyses introduced into the plot tends to make it evolve into the realm of fantasy. I feel the plot is good but spoilt by the psychoanalyses. However, I enjoyed the detail about New York and, in particular, the construction details of the Manhattan Bridge.

Is this helpful?

GraJon said on Mar 7, 2009 | Add your feedback