Like The Logic of Sense?
Join aNobii to see if your friends read it, and discover similar books!
Book Description
Considered one of the most important works of one of France's foremost philosophers, and long-awaited in English, The Logic of Sense begins with an extended exegesis of Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland. Considering stoicism, language, games, sexuality, schizophrenia, and literaContinue
Book Details
-
Rating:




(3)
- English Books
- Paperback 393 Pages
- Edition: Reprint
- ISBN-10: 0231059833
- ISBN-13: 9780231059831
- Publisher: Columbia University Press
- Pub date: Apr 15, 1990
- Dimensions: 1548 mm x 968 mm x 194 mm Just how big is that?
- Also available as: Hardcover and Others
Prices Change currency & sellers
| ISBN | Edition | List | Sale | Seller |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9780231059831 | Paperback | $24.95 | $22.01 | bn.com |
| $24.95 | $19.26 | The Book Depository | ||
| Other editions → | ||||
| + 1 copy tradable: → | ||||
I haven't read the main part, but it contains a highly interesting appendix on Plato's notorious division dialogues (the Sophist and the Statesman. He argues that: (1) The division is not a way of classifying things into groups and subgroups, but a way of separating the true nature of ... (continue)
I haven't read the main part, but it contains a highly interesting appendix on Plato's notorious division dialogues (the Sophist and the Statesman. He argues that: (1) The division is not a way of classifying things into groups and subgroups, but a way of separating the true nature of the thing under investigation from its unreal appearances. Now this is a very political reading it seems to me, since this implies that Plato is trying to indicate not only that popular notions about the sophist are imperfect to the extent that they contain too many sophist images in them and requires purification, but also that even with a right opinion about who is a sophist, a cheater on his part can still exploit that opinion to claim himself to be or not to be a sophist. (2) A point that follows is that Aristotle's critique of Plato's bifurcation method makes no sense and one should be careful of reading Aristotelian's genus-species scheme into diaeresis. (3) Division should be understood as part and parcel of dialectic just as the famous myth in the Statesman is part and parcel of dialectic. Deleuze almost shows us how to read Plato in an anti-Platonic, but fundamentally Platonic and non-Derrideanly-deconstructive way. Highly recommended.
Is this helpful?