isabella 37. London, United Kingdom

I don't know.
I guess I missed out on the neilgaimanism.
Perhaps I should have started from "stardust" or "the sandman".
The story seemed interesting, reading it was not.
I have found it obvious, the narrative mode did not seduce me in the least and it gets worse towards the end.
Overall: a great disappointment.
Left it on a platform' seat at borough station for someone else to enjoy it.

“Does the white man understand our custom about land?” “How can he when he does not even speak our tongue? But he says that our customs are bad; and our own brothers who have taken up his religion also say that our customs are bad. How do you think we can fight when our own brothers have turned against us? The white man is very clever. He came quietly and peaceably with his religion. We were amused at his foolishness and allowed him to stay. Now he has won our brothers, and our clan can no longer act like one. He has put a knife on the things that held us together and we have fallen apart.”
(Dialogue between Obierika and Okonkwo)

...so stevenson never tells of the type of sinful and evil acts hyde would take pleasure in and it's left to the reader to explore the depth of human depravity.
however, in my opinion, no other book brilliantly captures the double nature of the english: jekyll-like, monday to friday from 9 to 5, and after a good number of pints of beer, hyde-like from 5pm onwards any weekdays and weekends.
a thoroughly enjoyable reading experience.