Plots are all predictable, and in fact, quite lame at some points. (honestly, hunky gardener at the back yard who made love with you on the grass, thats so very lame!)
For some reason, I couldnt help but thinking Helen Fielding (Bridget Jones' Dairy) has better sense of humour.
Plots are all predictable, and in fact, quite lame at some points. (honestly, hunky gardener at the back yard who made love with you on the grass, thats so very lame!)
For some reason, I couldnt help but thinking Helen Fielding (Bridget Jones' Dairy) has better sense of humour.
Well, altho this book is not as good as I expected, it was still a fun read.
Simple story line, repetitive phrases used by author, e.g "roll eyes to heaven", which shows author's lack of vocabularies and poor creative writing skills.
Main Character, Holly, is a powerless character, failed to be adored by reader(s) even she seemed like an easy-going-sometimes-funny-(no
... (continue)
Simple story line, repetitive phrases used by author, e.g "roll eyes to heaven", which shows author's lack of vocabularies and poor creative writing skills.
Main Character, Holly, is a powerless character, failed to be adored by reader(s) even she seemed like an easy-going-sometimes-funny-(not)woman.
The story drags on and on about little details which has no significant impact to the plot, eg. "girls in the city" video part was so not funny and long-windedly told, also Holly and friends pretended to be stars in front of those barbie-looking gals before flying to Spain was short and ended without explaining anything like, maybe the girls discovered the truth??
Everything seems so cheesy in this story. I felt like I was reading an early 90's soap in words or some kind of English coursework done by a wealthy high school girl over Christmas who has all the love of the world.
Most terrible chick-lit ever. I wonder how it can be a no 1 best seller and has a movie coming up!
The Undomestic Goddess
Plots are all predictable, and in fact, quite lame at some points. (honestly, hunky gardener at the back yard who made love with you on the grass, thats so very lame!)
For some reason, I couldnt help but thinking Helen Fielding (Bridget Jones' Dairy) has better sense of humour.
W ... (continue)
Plots are all predictable, and in fact, quite lame at some points. (honestly, hunky gardener at the back yard who made love with you on the grass, thats so very lame!)
For some reason, I couldnt help but thinking Helen Fielding (Bridget Jones' Dairy) has better sense of humour.
Well, altho this book is not as good as I expected, it was still a fun read.
PS, I Love You
Simple story line, repetitive phrases used by author, e.g "roll eyes to heaven", which shows author's lack of vocabularies and poor creative writing skills.
Main Character, Holly, is a powerless character, failed to be adored by reader(s) even she seemed like an easy-going-sometimes-funny-(no ... (continue)
Simple story line, repetitive phrases used by author, e.g "roll eyes to heaven", which shows author's lack of vocabularies and poor creative writing skills.
Main Character, Holly, is a powerless character, failed to be adored by reader(s) even she seemed like an easy-going-sometimes-funny-(not)woman.
The story drags on and on about little details which has no significant impact to the plot, eg. "girls in the city" video part was so not funny and long-windedly told, also Holly and friends pretended to be stars in front of those barbie-looking gals before flying to Spain was short and ended without explaining anything like, maybe the girls discovered the truth??
Everything seems so cheesy in this story. I felt like I was reading an early 90's soap in words or some kind of English coursework done by a wealthy high school girl over Christmas who has all the love of the world.
Most terrible chick-lit ever. I wonder how it can be a no 1 best seller and has a movie coming up!